Nursing-home research · National data report

How Many Counties Actually Offer a Choice of Nursing Home

Almost every guide to choosing a nursing home — including ours — assumes you have facilities to choose between. This report measures how often that assumption holds, county by county.

By SeniorCareRating.com Editorial Team · Published 2026-08-05 · CMS data released 2026-08-21

What the county data shows

Across the 2,850 counties with at least one CMS-certified nursing home, 849 (29.8%) have exactly one — meaning a family searching locally has no second option to compare it against. A further 1,003 counties have two or three, so 65% of counties offer three facilities or fewer. Comparison advice, star ratings, and side-by-side tools all presuppose a field of options; for a substantial share of the country, the practical question is not which facility but whether to travel. This is analysis of public CMS data; SeniorCareRating.com does not rate providers or places.
Counties with a facility
2,850
in this dataset
Have exactly one
29.8%
849 counties
Have three or fewer
65%
limited local choice
Highest single-facility share
78.6%
Nevada

How much choice a county actually offers

Counties grouped by how many CMS-certified nursing homes they contain.

Counties by number of facilities

How many counties fall into each band of local availability.

1 facility — no local comparison
849
2–3 facilities
1,003
4 or more
998
2,850 counties with at least one certified nursing home.

CMS-reported data · updated 2026-08-21 · site-calculated context, not a CMS rating

Methodology
Counted across every county in this dataset containing at least one CMS-certified nursing home. Counties with no certified facility do not appear in the CMS county records this is built from, so the true share of counties without local access is higher than shown here — this measures choice among counties that have any provider at all.

Where single-facility counties are most common

States by the share of their counties containing exactly one certified nursing home.

Share of counties with only one facility, by state

Where a county-level search is most likely to return a single option.

Nevada
78.6%
Alaska
71.4%
Wyoming
59.1%
Montana
58.8%
Idaho
57.6%
Utah
52.4%
Georgia
47.6%
Nationally, 29.8% of counties with a facility have exactly one.

This tracks population geography more than anything else — states with many rural counties concentrate at the top.

CMS-reported data · updated 2026-08-21 · site-calculated context, not a CMS rating

Methodology
Share = counties containing exactly one certified nursing home ÷ counties containing at least one. States with fewer than 10 such counties are excluded from the ranking (7 excluded); they remain in the national totals.

What this changes about the advice

Guidance written for a metro market does not transfer to a single-facility county.

Standard guidance — shortlist several facilities, compare them on the same CMS fields, tour two or three — assumes a market. In a county with one certified nursing home, that workflow does not apply, and repeating it is not neutral advice but a failure to describe the actual situation.

Where there is one local option, the useful questions change. Instead of comparing facilities, the comparison is between the local facility and the cost of distance: what does the CMS record for that facility show, what would travelling to the next county offer, and what does the family realistically sustain in visiting. Distance has its own consequences for how often relatives visit, which no CMS measure captures.

This also affects how a rating should be read. A one-star facility in a county with six options and a one-star facility that is the only provider for an hour in any direction present very different decisions, though the data shows the same number. Our guide on comparing nursing homes covers the within-state comparison rules that still apply when you do widen the search.

Limits of this analysis

What the public data can and cannot tell you.

Counties are an administrative unit, not a travel radius. A county with one facility may sit beside a metro county with twenty, and a large western county may be several hours across, so county counts approximate access rather than measure it. Counties with no certified facility at all are not represented in the CMS county records this is built from, which means real access gaps are understated here. Nothing in this report evaluates any facility, county, or state. Confirm current availability on Medicare’s Care Compare. See Methodology.

The CMS Research Brief

New CMS data releases, Special Focus Facility changes, and each new analysis.

One email covering what changed in the public CMS record: dataset releases and what moved in them, additions to and departures from the Special Focus Facility list, and any new analysis published here. Written for people who work with this data. Roughly monthly.

I agree to receive the CMS Research Brief by email and understand I can unsubscribe at any time. Your address is stored only to send this brief. No health or care information is collected, nothing is shared with providers or advertisers, and SeniorCareRating.com does not sell or rent subscriber data.

Related research

SeniorCareRating.com summarizes public CMS data. It is not affiliated with CMS, Medicare.gov, or any nursing home. Data may lag current conditions. This is not medical, legal, or care-placement advice — always verify with official sources and qualified professionals.