Methodology

How we turn CMS data into clear facility profiles

Every figure on SeniorCareRating.com comes from the official CMS Provider Data Catalog (Care Compare). We organize it — we do not editorialize beyond what the source supports.

Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog· refreshed 2026-07-17

What we use

CMS star ratings
Source: CMS

Overall, health inspection, staffing, and quality-measure ratings — shown verbatim from CMS Care Compare.

Health inspection findings
Source: CMS

What inspectors found, with the CMS severity letter (A–L), dates, and status. We keep short codes, never long narrative text.

Staffing
Source: CMS

The CMS staffing star rating, shown as reported.

Care measures
Source: CMS

CMS care indicators for long-stay residents: antipsychotic medication, pressure ulcers, and falls with major injury (averaged over the year).

Federal penalties
Source: CMS

Total fines (CMPs) and payment-denial records CMS reports in the recent lookback window.

Ownership / chain
Source: CMS

CMS-reported chain name and ownership fields, grouped conservatively across 2+ facilities.

How we organize the data

We report CMS-reported facts. We do not add our own rating, score, ranking, or opinion. The CMS star ratings are always shown as CMS publishes them.

Listing pages (county and ownership pages) show the most relevant CMS records first so longer lists are easier to scan. That ordering uses CMS-reported fields (such as the CMS overall rating and federal penalty records) — it is a sort order, not a judgment about any facility, owner, or chain.

Missing data is shown as missing — never treated as a result. Where CMS does not report a value, the page says so rather than implying anything.

How we judge severity

CMS grades each inspection finding from A to L. We count G–L as “more serious” (actual harm or immediate danger). The full inspection reports stay at CMS.

Ownership & chain grouping

We prefer CMS’s own chain identifiers, grouping facilities only where records show a shared organization across 2+ facilities. Association does not by itself imply any wrongdoing by an owner.

Limitations

  • Data can lag current conditions at a facility.
  • Ownership data is complex and can be incomplete.
  • Missing data is shown as missing — never as a result.
  • This is not medical, legal, or care-placement advice.
  • Always verify with official CMS records and qualified professionals.
  • We report CMS-reported facts and do not add our own rating or opinion.
Methodology & limits.The full field-by-field mapping from CMS source files is documented in the repository’s METHODOLOGY.md. See methodology.
SeniorCareRating.com summarizes public CMS data. It is not affiliated with CMS, Medicare.gov, or any nursing home. Data may lag current conditions. This is not medical, legal, or care-placement advice — always verify with official sources and qualified professionals.