Nursing-home research · National data report

The Geography of CMS Five-Star Nursing Homes

CMS's highest overall rating is far more common in some states than others. This report measures that spread — and explains why CMS itself cautions against reading it as a state-by-state quality ranking.

By SeniorCareRating.com Editorial Team · Published 2026-08-02 · CMS data released 2026-08-03

What the state-level data shows

Across the 14,700 CMS-certified nursing homes in this snapshot, 20.7% hold the five-star overall rating — CMS’s highest. The state spread is wide: 40.5% of facilities in Hawaii carry five stars against 9.4% in Louisiana. That spread is real in the data, but it is not a state quality ranking — a large part of the overall rating is built on health inspections, which are conducted by each state’s own survey agency, and CMS itself cautions that inspection-based comparisons across state lines are less reliable than comparisons within a state. This is analysis of public CMS data; SeniorCareRating.com does not rate providers or states.
Facilities analyzed
14,700
CMS-certified
Rated 5★, nationally
20.7%
3,039 facilities
Highest state share
40.5%
Hawaii
Lowest state share
9.4%
Louisiana

Where five-star facilities are most common

The share of each state's certified nursing homes holding the CMS five-star overall rating.

Highest 5-star share, by state

States where the largest share of facilities hold CMS's top overall rating.

National share: 20.7% of 14,700 facilities.

CMS-reported data · updated 2026-08-03 · site-calculated context, not a CMS rating

Methodology
Share = facilities rated 5 stars overall ÷ all CMS-certified facilities in the state (including unrated). States with fewer than 20 facilities are excluded from rankings (3 excluded); they remain in the national totals.

Where they are least common

States where CMS's top overall rating is rare.

Lowest 5-star share, by state

States where few facilities hold the top overall rating.

Lower shares reflect the CMS record in that state, not a verdict on its care.

A low share does not establish that a state's care is worse — survey practices differ by state, and the overall rating leans on state-administered inspections.

CMS-reported data · updated 2026-08-03 · site-calculated context, not a CMS rating

Methodology
Same calculation and exclusions as above.

Why cross-state comparison is unreliable

The caveat is not fine print — it is the finding.

The CMS overall star rating is anchored on the health-inspection rating, and health inspections are conducted by each state’s own survey agency under its own staffing, backlog, and enforcement conditions. CMS additionally scores the inspection domain relative to other facilities within the same state, which builds a state-by-state curve into the rating itself. Two identical facilities in different states can therefore carry different stars. That is why this site compares facilities against their own state and county on every state research page, and never publishes a state ranking. Within a state, the spread is meaningful; across states, it mixes care differences with process differences that public data cannot separate.

Limits of this analysis

What the public data can and cannot tell you.

These figures describe a dated CMS snapshot, not live conditions. Shares describe the CMS record, not the quality of care in any state, and nothing here recommends any facility or state. Confirm the current record on Medicare’s Care Compare. See Methodology and Data updates.

SeniorCareRating.com summarizes public CMS data. It is not affiliated with CMS, Medicare.gov, or any nursing home. Data may lag current conditions. This is not medical, legal, or care-placement advice — always verify with official sources and qualified professionals.