The Oaks at Lakewood
11411 Bridgeport Way, Tacoma, WA, 98499
CMS ownership records associate this facility with The Ensign Group · For profit - Limited Liability company.
At a glance
- CMS overall
- 5
- of 5
- Health inspection
- 5
- of 5
- Staffing
- 3
- of 5
- Quality measures
- 5
- of 5
- Certified beds
- 80
- CMS-reported
CMS rating profile
The four CMS ratings on one aligned scale, with county and state averages for context.
Rating profile
How this facility's overall rating relates to its three CMS component ratings.
CMS-reported data · updated 2026-07-17
Comparative context
This facility's CMS overall rating next to its county and state averages.
CMS-reported data · updated 2026-07-17 · site-calculated context, not a CMS rating
Methodology
Inspections and citations
Health-inspection citations CMS reports for this facility. Individual records are in the technical appendix.
Citation profile
How many citations CMS reports, how severe, and when they occurred.
CMS-reported data · updated 2026-07-17
Methodology
Federal records
Federal fines (CMPs) and payment-denial records CMS reports in the recent reporting period. These are distinct record types and are never merged.
No federal penalty records are included in this data for this facility.
Staffing and care
Selected CMS care indicators for long-stay residents, with a typical level for context. The CMS staffing star rating appears in the rating profile above.
Selected care measures
How this facility's reported care indicators sit against a typical level.
Long-stay residents given antipsychotic medication.
Long-stay residents with new or worsened pressure ulcers.
Long-stay residents with one or more falls with major injury.
CMS-reported data · updated 2026-07-17 · site-calculated context, not a CMS rating
Methodology
Ownership
Facilities and agencies grouped by CMS-reported ownership fields. A company appearing here does not by itself mean it controlled day-to-day care or did anything wrong.
| Owner / organization | Role |
|---|---|
| Bradburn, Kasey | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY |
| Sekeramayi, Maggie | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY |
| Farnsworth, Stephen | CORPORATE DIRECTOR |
| Burnam, Soon | CORPORATE OFFICER |
| Keetch, Chad | CORPORATE OFFICER |
| Ross, Steve | CORPORATE OFFICER |
| Sato, Ami | CORPORATE OFFICER |
| Bradburn, Kasey | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL |
| Sekeramayi, Maggie | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL |
| Port, Barry | INDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNF |
| Caretrust Gp LLC | ADP OF THE SNF |
| Caretrust Reit Inc | ADP OF THE SNF |
| Ctr Partnership LP | ADP OF THE SNF |
| Ensign Services Inc | ADP OF THE SNF |
| Bradburn, Kasey | ADP OF THE SNF |
| Sekeramayi, Maggie | ADP OF THE SNF |
Nearby facilities
Other CMS-certified nursing homes near Pierce County.
Verify the current location and license with official sources.
| Facility | Location | Overall | Health | Staffing | CMS abuse icon | Federal penalties |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Avamere Rehabilitation of Issaquah CCN 505004 | Issaquah, WA | 2 | 2 | 2 | Not shown | $48,663 |
| Avamere Rehabilitation of Shoreline CCN 505009 | Seattle, WA | 2 | 1 | 3 | Not shown | $0 |
| Garden Village CCN 505010 | Yakima, WA | 2 | 2 | 2 | Not shown | $102,166 |
| Grays Harbor Health & Rehabilitation Center CCN 505016 | Aberdeen, WA | 4 | 4 | 3 | Not shown | $0 |
| Washington Care Center CCN 505017 | Seattle, WA | 3 | 2 | 4 | Not shown | $58,704 |
| Spokane Falls Care CCN 505024 | Spokane, WA | 1 | 1 | 2 | Not shown | $125,736 |
Related research
Frequently asked questions
What is The Oaks at Lakewood's CMS rating?
The Oaks at Lakewood has a 5-star CMS overall rating (out of 5) in the current dataset, with CMS component ratings of 5 for health inspections, 3 for staffing, and 5 for quality measures. A star rating is a CMS summary of past data, not a judgment about current conditions.
Where is The Oaks at Lakewood located?
The Oaks at Lakewood is located at 11411 Bridgeport Way, Tacoma, WA, 98499 in Pierce County, and CMS lists 80 certified beds.
Does The Oaks at Lakewood have federal penalties or payment denials on record?
The current CMS data shows no federal penalty amounts or payment denials for The Oaks at Lakewood over roughly the past three years. Records can change; confirm current status on CMS Care Compare.
How does The Oaks at Lakewood's rating compare to nearby facilities?
The Oaks at Lakewood's CMS overall rating is 5 of 5. For comparison, the average CMS overall rating is 2.9 across 21 facilities in Pierce County, and 3.29 across Washington. Averages exclude facilities CMS has not rated, and a star rating is a CMS summary, not a judgment about any individual facility.
How can I verify The Oaks at Lakewood's current information?
SeniorCareRating.com organizes public CMS data and is not affiliated with CMS. Confirm The Oaks at Lakewood's current ratings, inspection reports, and license status on the official CMS Care Compare site and with your state survey agency.
Technical appendix
Record identifiers
- CMS provider number (CCN)
- 505347
- Ownership type
- For profit - Limited Liability company
- Certified beds
- 80
- Data snapshot
- 2026-07-17
All 28 citation records
| Date | CMS tag | Severity | Type | CMS deficiency status | Correction date |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 29, 2026 | 0609 | E | Standard | Deficient, Provider has date of correction | Feb 13, 2026 |
| Jan 29, 2026 | 0641 | D | Standard | Deficient, Provider has date of correction | Feb 13, 2026 |
| Jan 29, 2026 | 0732 | C | Standard | Deficient, Provider has date of correction | Feb 13, 2026 |
| Oct 22, 2024 | 0584 | D | Standard | Deficient, Provider has date of correction | Nov 26, 2024 |
| Oct 22, 2024 | 0641 | D | Standard | Deficient, Provider has date of correction | Nov 26, 2024 |
| Oct 22, 2024 | 0657 | D | Standard | Deficient, Provider has date of correction | Nov 26, 2024 |
| Oct 22, 2024 | 0677 | D | Standard | Deficient, Provider has date of correction | Nov 26, 2024 |
| Oct 22, 2024 | 0684 | D | Standard | Deficient, Provider has date of correction | Nov 26, 2024 |
| Oct 22, 2024 | 0686 | D | Standard | Deficient, Provider has date of correction | Nov 26, 2024 |
| Oct 22, 2024 | 0689 | D | Standard | Deficient, Provider has date of correction | Nov 26, 2024 |
| Oct 22, 2024 | 0695 | D | Standard | Deficient, Provider has date of correction | Nov 26, 2024 |
| Oct 22, 2024 | 0697 | D | Standard | Deficient, Provider has date of correction | Nov 26, 2024 |
| Oct 22, 2024 | 0698 | D | Standard | Deficient, Provider has date of correction | Nov 26, 2024 |
| Oct 22, 2024 | 0761 | D | Standard | Deficient, Provider has date of correction | Nov 26, 2024 |
| Oct 22, 2024 | 0790 | D | Standard | Deficient, Provider has date of correction | Nov 26, 2024 |
| Oct 22, 2024 | 0791 | D | Standard | Deficient, Provider has date of correction | Nov 26, 2024 |
| Oct 22, 2024 | 0880 | E | Standard | Deficient, Provider has date of correction | Nov 26, 2024 |
| Dec 8, 2023 | 0625 | E | Standard | Deficient, Provider has date of correction | Jan 12, 2024 |
| Dec 8, 2023 | 0641 | D | Standard | Deficient, Provider has date of correction | Jan 12, 2024 |
| Dec 8, 2023 | 0645 | D | Standard | Deficient, Provider has date of correction | Jan 12, 2024 |
| Dec 8, 2023 | 0656 | D | Standard | Deficient, Provider has date of correction | Jan 12, 2024 |
| Dec 8, 2023 | 0658 | D | Standard | Deficient, Provider has date of correction | Jan 12, 2024 |
| Dec 8, 2023 | 0677 | D | Standard | Deficient, Provider has date of correction | Jan 12, 2024 |
| Dec 8, 2023 | 0685 | E | Standard | Deficient, Provider has date of correction | Jan 12, 2024 |
| Dec 8, 2023 | 0698 | D | Standard | Deficient, Provider has date of correction | Jan 12, 2024 |
How to verify this data
- The current CMS profile on Medicare’s Care Compare
- Your state survey agency’s latest inspection reports
- Any recent complaint investigations
- Current ownership and license status
SeniorCareRating.com organizes public CMS data and is not affiliated with CMS. Ratings and records are CMS-reported summaries of past data, not a judgment about current conditions. See methodology.