Nursing home

Meadow Brook Rehabilitation and Nursing

433 East 2700 South, Salt Lake City, UT, 84115

CMS ownership records associate this facility with Cascades Healthcare · Government - Hospital district.

CMS overall rating
CMS overall rating: 1 out of 51of 5

At a glance

CMS reports a 1-star overall rating for Meadow Brook Rehabilitation and Nursing, with 59 inspection citations on record (8 higher severity). Federal records include $31,331 and 1 payment-denial record in the current dataset.
CMS overall
1
of 5
Health inspection
1
of 5
Staffing
3
of 5
Quality measures
4
of 5
Certified beds
41
CMS-reported

CMS rating profile

The four CMS ratings on one aligned scale, with county and state averages for context.

Rating profile

How this facility's overall rating relates to its three CMS component ratings.

Overall1 of 5
Health inspection1 of 5
Staffing3 of 5
Quality measures4 of 5

CMS-reported data · updated 2026-07-17

Comparative context

This facility's CMS overall rating next to its county and state averages.

This facility 1
15
Salt Lake Co. avg 3.2Utah avg 3.35This facility
This facility: 1 of 5. Salt Lake Co. avg: 3.2. Utah avg: 3.35.

CMS-reported data · updated 2026-07-17 · site-calculated context, not a CMS rating

Methodology
Averages are calculated from CMS records included in this dataset and exclude facilities CMS has not rated. A neutral reference point, not a CMS rating or a pass/fail line.

Inspections and citations

Health-inspection citations CMS reports for this facility. Individual records are in the technical appendix.

Citation profile

How many citations CMS reports, how severe, and when they occurred.

59
Citations on record
8
Higher severity (G–L)
45
From complaints
0
Infection control
Citations by inspection year
42022
432024
122025
Higher severity Standard

CMS-reported data · updated 2026-07-17

Methodology
Severity uses the CMS scope-and-severity letter (G–L count as higher severity). Counts are CMS-reported inspection findings, not a judgment about current conditions.

Federal records

Federal fines (CMPs) and payment-denial records CMS reports in the recent reporting period. These are distinct record types and are never merged.

Federal fines (CMP)

Fine records over time, sized by amount.

1 record · $31,331 total · Feb 22, 2024
  1. Feb 22, 2024$31,331

CMS-reported data · updated 2026-07-17

Payment denials

Payment-denial records over time, sized by duration.

1 record · 6 days total · Feb 22, 2024
  1. Feb 22, 20246 days

CMS-reported data · updated 2026-07-17

Methodology
CMS may deny Medicare/Medicaid payment for new admissions. This is a distinct record type from a civil monetary fine. Confirm current status on CMS Care Compare.

Staffing and care

Selected CMS care indicators for long-stay residents, with a typical level for context. The CMS staffing star rating appears in the rating profile above.

Selected care measures

How this facility's reported care indicators sit against a typical level.

3 of 3 care measures reported by CMS
On antipsychotic medication(lower is better)12.5%

Long-stay residents given antipsychotic medication.

With new/worsened pressure ulcers(lower is better)4.1%

Long-stay residents with new or worsened pressure ulcers.

Falls with major injury(lower is better)3.31%

Long-stay residents with one or more falls with major injury.

CMS-reported data · updated 2026-07-17 · site-calculated context, not a CMS rating

Methodology
The tick marks a typical level for context and is calculated from CMS records included in this dataset — not a CMS rating. Per-shift staffing hours are not part of this dataset. Missing values are shown as “Not reported”, never as zero.

Facilities and agencies grouped by CMS-reported ownership fields. A company appearing here does not by itself mean it controlled day-to-day care or did anything wrong.

Owner / organizationRole
Langford, ScottMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY
Mcspadden, DarinMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY
Barney, JanettCORPORATE DIRECTOR
Brown, GaryCORPORATE DIRECTOR
Oakden, RichardCORPORATE DIRECTOR
Robinson, MatthewCORPORATE DIRECTOR
Smith, ValCORPORATE DIRECTOR
White, CraigCORPORATE DIRECTOR
Langford, ScottCORPORATE OFFICER
Mcspadden, DarinCORPORATE OFFICER
Cascades Healthcare LLCOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL
Baird, GregoryOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL
Hills, KyleOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL
Mcspadden, DarinOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL
Mcspadden, DarinINDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNF
Cascades Healthcare LLCADP OF THE SNF
Baird, GregoryADP OF THE SNF
Hills, KyleADP OF THE SNF
Mcspadden, DarinADP OF THE SNF

Nearby facilities

Other CMS-certified nursing homes near Salt Lake County.

433 East 2700 South, Salt Lake City
Salt Lake County · UT · 84115
41 certified beds40.7127, -111.8800

Verify the current location and license with official sources.

FacilityLocationOverallHealthStaffingCMS abuse iconFederal penalties
Heritage Park Healthcare and Rehabilitation
CCN 465003
Roy, UT323Shown$36,645
Mt. Olympus Rehabilitation Center
CCN 465006
Salt Lake City, UT213Not shown$149,703
Harrison Pointe Healthcare and Rehabilitation
CCN 465009
Ogden, UT332Not shown$0
Monument Healthcare Pioneer Trail
CCN 465020
Brigham City, UT433Not shown$19,747
Spring Creek Healthcare Center
CCN 465049
Salt Lake City, UT222Not shown$53,472
Four Corners Regional Care Center
CCN 465057
Blanding, UT121Not shown$68,471

Related research

Frequently asked questions

What is Meadow Brook Rehabilitation and Nursing's CMS rating?

Meadow Brook Rehabilitation and Nursing has a 1-star CMS overall rating (out of 5) in the current dataset, with CMS component ratings of 1 for health inspections, 3 for staffing, and 4 for quality measures. A star rating is a CMS summary of past data, not a judgment about current conditions.

Where is Meadow Brook Rehabilitation and Nursing located?

Meadow Brook Rehabilitation and Nursing is located at 433 East 2700 South, Salt Lake City, UT, 84115 in Salt Lake County, and CMS lists 41 certified beds.

Does Meadow Brook Rehabilitation and Nursing have federal penalties or payment denials on record?

The CMS data includes $31,331 in federal fine amounts and 1 payment-denial record for Meadow Brook Rehabilitation and Nursing over roughly the past three years. These are CMS-reported records; see CMS Care Compare for the details and context.

How does Meadow Brook Rehabilitation and Nursing's rating compare to nearby facilities?

Meadow Brook Rehabilitation and Nursing's CMS overall rating is 1 of 5. For comparison, the average CMS overall rating is 3.2 across 35 facilities in Salt Lake County, and 3.35 across Utah. Averages exclude facilities CMS has not rated, and a star rating is a CMS summary, not a judgment about any individual facility.

How can I verify Meadow Brook Rehabilitation and Nursing's current information?

SeniorCareRating.com organizes public CMS data and is not affiliated with CMS. Confirm Meadow Brook Rehabilitation and Nursing's current ratings, inspection reports, and license status on the official CMS Care Compare site and with your state survey agency.

Technical appendix

Record identifiers

CMS provider number (CCN)
465158
Ownership type
Government - Hospital district
Certified beds
41
Data snapshot
2026-07-17
All 59 citation records
DateCMS tagSeverityTypeCMS deficiency statusCorrection date
Nov 20, 20250584EStandardDeficient, Provider has date of correctionDec 15, 2025
Nov 20, 20250609DStandardDeficient, Provider has date of correctionDec 5, 2025
Nov 20, 20250628DStandardDeficient, Provider has date of correctionDec 15, 2025
Nov 20, 20250692DStandardDeficient, Provider has date of correctionDec 15, 2025
Nov 20, 20250770DStandardDeficient, Provider has date of correctionDec 15, 2025
Nov 20, 20250773DStandardDeficient, Provider has date of correctionDec 15, 2025
Nov 20, 20250775EStandardDeficient, Provider has date of correctionDec 15, 2025
Nov 20, 20250804EStandardDeficient, Provider has date of correctionDec 15, 2025
Nov 20, 20250805DStandardDeficient, Provider has date of correctionDec 15, 2025
Nov 20, 20250812FStandardDeficient, Provider has date of correctionDec 15, 2025
Nov 20, 20250600DComplaintDeficient, Provider has date of correctionDec 15, 2025
Nov 20, 20250887EComplaintDeficient, Provider has date of correctionDec 15, 2025
Oct 24, 20240684DComplaintDeficient, Provider has date of correctionDec 9, 2024
Feb 22, 20240550DComplaintDeficient, Provider has date of correctionApr 19, 2024
Feb 22, 20240558DComplaintDeficient, Provider has date of correctionApr 19, 2024
Feb 22, 20240565EComplaintDeficient, Provider has date of correctionApr 19, 2024
Feb 22, 20240578GComplaintDeficient, Provider has date of correctionApr 19, 2024
Feb 22, 20240580DComplaintDeficient, Provider has date of correctionApr 19, 2024
Feb 22, 20240584EComplaintDeficient, Provider has date of correctionApr 19, 2024
Feb 22, 20240600EComplaintDeficient, Provider has date of correctionApr 19, 2024
Feb 22, 20240607EComplaintDeficient, Provider has date of correctionApr 19, 2024
Feb 22, 20240609EComplaintDeficient, Provider has date of correctionApr 19, 2024
Feb 22, 20240610EComplaintDeficient, Provider has date of correctionApr 19, 2024
Feb 22, 20240624GComplaintDeficient, Provider has date of correctionApr 19, 2024
Feb 22, 20240644EComplaintDeficient, Provider has date of correctionApr 19, 2024
Showing the 25 most recent of 59 citations.

How to verify this data

  • The current CMS profile on Medicare’s Care Compare
  • Your state survey agency’s latest inspection reports
  • Any recent complaint investigations
  • Current ownership and license status

SeniorCareRating.com organizes public CMS data and is not affiliated with CMS. Ratings and records are CMS-reported summaries of past data, not a judgment about current conditions. See methodology.

SeniorCareRating.com summarizes public CMS data. It is not affiliated with CMS, Medicare.gov, or any nursing home. Data may lag current conditions. This is not medical, legal, or care-placement advice — always verify with official sources and qualified professionals.