Eaton Creek Post Acute
4343 Ashland City Highway, Nashville, TN, 37218
CMS ownership records associate this facility with Pacs Group · For profit - Corporation.
At a glance
- CMS overall
- —
- not rated
- Health inspection
- —
- not rated
- Staffing
- —
- not rated
- Quality measures
- —
- not rated
- Certified beds
- 124
- CMS-reported
CMS rating profile
The four CMS ratings on one aligned scale, with county and state averages for context.
Rating profile
How this facility's overall rating relates to its three CMS component ratings.
CMS-reported data · updated 2026-08-21
Inspections and citations
Health-inspection citations CMS reports for this facility. Individual records are in the technical appendix.
Citation profile
How many citations CMS reports, how severe, and when they occurred.
CMS-reported data · updated 2026-08-21
Methodology
Federal records
Federal fines (CMPs) and payment-denial records CMS reports in the recent reporting period. These are distinct record types and are never merged.
- Federal fines (CMP)
- $122,242
- 3 records
- Payment denials
- 1
- record in this dataset
- Reporting window
- ~3 yrs
- CMS-reported records
Fine and payment-denial timelines
Federal fines (CMP)
Fine records over time, sized by amount.
- Feb 6, 2025$15,512
- Nov 7, 2024$95,384
- Aug 30, 2023$11,346
CMS-reported data · updated 2026-08-21
Payment denials
Payment-denial records over time, sized by duration.
- Nov 7, 202425 days
CMS-reported data · updated 2026-08-21
Methodology
Staffing and care
Selected CMS care indicators for long-stay residents, with a typical level for context. The CMS staffing star rating appears in the rating profile above.
Selected care measures
How this facility's reported care indicators sit against a typical level.
Long-stay residents given antipsychotic medication.
Long-stay residents with new or worsened pressure ulcers.
Long-stay residents with one or more falls with major injury.
CMS-reported data · updated 2026-08-21 · site-calculated context, not a CMS rating
Methodology
Ownership
Facilities and agencies grouped by CMS-reported ownership fields. A company appearing here does not by itself mean it controlled day-to-day care or did anything wrong.
| Owner / organization | Role |
|---|---|
| Branch Banking & Trust Company | 5% OR GREATER SECURITY INTEREST |
| Truist Bank | 5% OR GREATER SECURITY INTEREST |
| Collins, Millard | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY |
| Miller, Gina | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY |
| Perkins, Toni | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY |
| Smith, Michael | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY |
| Wakefield, Tanisha | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY |
| Apt, Frederick | CORPORATE OFFICER |
| Jergensen, Joshua | CORPORATE OFFICER |
| Mitchell, John | CORPORATE OFFICER |
| Providence Administrative Consulting Services Inc | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL |
| Hearns, Edward | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL |
| 4343 Ashland City Highway Tn LLC | ADP OF THE SNF |
| Providence Administrative Consulting Services Inc | ADP OF THE SNF |
| Collins, Millard | ADP OF THE SNF |
| Hearns, Edward | ADP OF THE SNF |
Looking for reviews of Eaton Creek Post Acute?
A direct answer, and where to find first-hand accounts.
SeniorCareRating.com does not publish consumer reviews, testimonials, or any rating of its own — not for Eaton Creek Post Acute and not for any provider. Nothing on this page is an opinion about the care delivered here.
What this page does contain is the public CMS record: state-survey inspection findings with their dates and severity, staffing levels, quality measures, federal penalty records, and ownership. Those are documented findings from official inspections and reporting rather than individual accounts, so they answer a different — and independently verifiable — part of the same question. See the record for Eaton Creek Post Acute
For first-hand accounts, the most reliable routes are people rather than pages: ask the provider directly for references from current residents or clients and their families, and speak with your state long-term care ombudsman, whose office advocates for residents and tracks complaints independently of the provider. Ombudsman services are free and confidential.
- Find your state long-term care ombudsman — National Long-Term Care Ombudsman Resource Center
- Eldercare Locator — the U.S. Administration for Community Living’s public referral service
Read published reviews from any source with the same care you would apply to the CMS record: both are partial. A small number of strongly worded reviews can reflect a handful of experiences rather than the typical one, and an inspection finding describes a specific date rather than conditions today.
Nearby facilities
Other CMS-certified nursing homes near Davidson County.
Verify the current location and license with official sources.
| Facility | Location | Overall | Health | Staffing | CMS abuse icon | Federal penalties |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nhc Healthcare, Oakwood CCN 445002 | Lewisburg, TN | 4 | 3 | 3 | Not shown | $0 |
| Nhc Healthcare, Dickson CCN 445004 | Dickson, TN | 5 | 4 | 4 | Not shown | $0 |
| Siskin Subacute West CCN 445008 | Chattanooga, TN | 2 | 1 | 5 | Not shown | $93,919 |
| Nhc Healthcare, Chattanooga CCN 445013 | Chattanooga, TN | 3 | 3 | 1 | Not shown | $0 |
| Asbury Place at Maryville CCN 445017 | Maryville, TN | 1 | 2 | 1 | Shown | $0 |
| Nhc Healthcare, Johnson City CCN 445024 | Johnson City, TN | 5 | 5 | 3 | Not shown | $0 |
Continue your research
- Compare Eaton Creek Post AcuteLine it up against other facilities
- Nursing homes in TennesseeState directory & CMS rating landscape
- Pacs Group — ownership profileThe operator's full CMS footprint
- How CMS rates the nation's nursing homesOriginal national research
- How to read CMS star ratings
- What CMS federal penalty records are
- Nursing-home staffing measures explained
- What is long-term care?
Frequently asked questions
What is Eaton Creek Post Acute's CMS rating?
Eaton Creek Post Acute does not have a CMS overall star rating in the current dataset. See its individual CMS records on this page, and confirm current status on the official CMS Care Compare site.
Where is Eaton Creek Post Acute located?
Eaton Creek Post Acute is located at 4343 Ashland City Highway, Nashville, TN, 37218 in Davidson County, and CMS lists 124 certified beds.
Does Eaton Creek Post Acute have federal penalties or payment denials on record?
The CMS data includes $122,242 in federal fine amounts and 1 payment-denial record for Eaton Creek Post Acute over roughly the past three years. These are CMS-reported records; see CMS Care Compare for the details and context.
Does SeniorCareRating.com have reviews for Eaton Creek Post Acute?
No. SeniorCareRating.com does not publish user reviews, ratings of its own, or testimonials about any facility. What this page shows instead is the public CMS record: state-survey inspection findings with their dates and severity, staffing and quality-measure ratings, federal penalty records, and ownership. Those are documented findings from official inspections rather than individual opinions, so they answer a different — and verifiable — part of the same question. For residents' and families' own accounts, ask the facility for references and speak with your state long-term care ombudsman.
How can I verify Eaton Creek Post Acute's current information?
SeniorCareRating.com organizes public CMS data and is not affiliated with CMS. Confirm Eaton Creek Post Acute's current ratings, inspection reports, and license status on the official CMS Care Compare site and with your state survey agency.
Technical appendix
Record identifiers
- CMS provider number (CCN)
- 445262
- Ownership type
- For profit - Corporation
- Certified beds
- 124
- Data snapshot
- 2026-08-21
All 35 citation records
| Date | CMS tag | Severity | Type | CMS deficiency status | Correction date |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 6, 2025 | 0689 | G | Complaint | Deficient, Provider has date of correction | Mar 11, 2025 |
| Nov 7, 2024 | 0600 | L | Complaint | Deficient, Provider has date of correction | Dec 9, 2024 |
| Nov 7, 2024 | 0602 | D | Complaint | Deficient, Provider has date of correction | Dec 9, 2024 |
| Nov 7, 2024 | 0609 | K | Complaint | Deficient, Provider has date of correction | Dec 9, 2024 |
| Nov 7, 2024 | 0610 | K | Complaint | Deficient, Provider has date of correction | Dec 9, 2024 |
| Nov 7, 2024 | 0622 | D | Complaint | Deficient, Provider has date of correction | Dec 9, 2024 |
| Nov 7, 2024 | 0625 | D | Complaint | Deficient, Provider has date of correction | Dec 9, 2024 |
| Nov 7, 2024 | 0657 | D | Complaint | Deficient, Provider has date of correction | Dec 9, 2024 |
| Nov 7, 2024 | 0677 | D | Complaint | Deficient, Provider has date of correction | Dec 9, 2024 |
| Nov 7, 2024 | 0684 | D | Complaint | Deficient, Provider has date of correction | Dec 9, 2024 |
| Nov 7, 2024 | 0686 | D | Complaint | Deficient, Provider has date of correction | Dec 9, 2024 |
| Nov 7, 2024 | 0689 | J | Complaint | Past Non-Compliance | Jun 27, 2024 |
| Nov 7, 2024 | 0692 | K | Complaint | Deficient, Provider has date of correction | Dec 9, 2024 |
| Nov 7, 2024 | 0725 | D | Complaint | Deficient, Provider has date of correction | Dec 9, 2024 |
| Nov 7, 2024 | 0727 | D | Complaint | Deficient, Provider has date of correction | Dec 9, 2024 |
| Nov 7, 2024 | 0835 | L | Complaint | Deficient, Provider has date of correction | Dec 9, 2024 |
| Nov 7, 2024 | 0837 | L | Complaint | Deficient, Provider has date of correction | Dec 9, 2024 |
| Nov 7, 2024 | 0867 | L | Complaint | Deficient, Provider has date of correction | Dec 9, 2024 |
| Aug 30, 2023 | 0565 | D | Complaint | Deficient, Provider has date of correction | Sep 29, 2023 |
| Aug 30, 2023 | 0584 | D | Complaint | Deficient, Provider has date of correction | Sep 29, 2023 |
| Aug 30, 2023 | 0610 | D | Complaint | Deficient, Provider has date of correction | Sep 29, 2023 |
| Aug 30, 2023 | 0623 | D | Complaint | Deficient, Provider has date of correction | Sep 29, 2023 |
| Aug 30, 2023 | 0625 | D | Complaint | Deficient, Provider has date of correction | Sep 29, 2023 |
| Aug 30, 2023 | 0684 | D | Complaint | Deficient, Provider has date of correction | Sep 29, 2023 |
| Aug 30, 2023 | 0689 | J | Complaint | Past Non-Compliance | Sep 26, 2022 |
How to verify this data
- The current CMS profile on Medicare’s Care Compare
- Your state survey agency’s latest inspection reports
- Any recent complaint investigations
- Current ownership and license status
SeniorCareRating.com organizes public CMS data and is not affiliated with CMS. Ratings and records are CMS-reported summaries of past data, not a judgment about current conditions. See methodology.