Nursing-home research · National data report

Nursing Home Staffing Ratings Across the U.S.

Staffing is one of the four domains CMS combines into the overall star, and it is among the weakest. This report measures how the staffing star is distributed nationally, how it compares with the other domains, and how often a strong overall rating sits on top of thin staffing.

By SeniorCareRating.com Editorial Team · Published 2026-08-18 · CMS data released 2026-08-21

What the staffing data shows

CMS assigns a staffing star to 14,492 of the 14,700 nursing homes in this snapshot. 40.8% of them — 5,914 facilities — sit in the bottom two staffing tiers. Averaged across facilities rated on all four domains, staffing is the second-weakest domain at 2.87★, while quality measures average 3.66★. Because the overall star blends all three contributing domains, 1,284 facilities (8.9%) carry a 4- or 5-star overall rating while being staffed in the bottom two tiers. This is analysis of public CMS data, not a ranking; SeniorCareRating.com does not rate providers.
Facilities with a staffing star
14,492
98.6% of 14,700
Rated 1–2★ on staffing
40.8%
5,914 facilities
Average staffing star
2.87★
of a possible 5
4–5★ overall, 1–2★ staffing
1,284
8.9% of fully-rated

How staffing stars are distributed

The national spread of the CMS staffing rating.

Facilities by staffing star

How many nursing homes fall into each CMS staffing tier nationally.

1-star staffing
19.6%
2-star staffing
21.3%
3-star staffing
23.9%
4-star staffing
23.2%
5-star staffing
12.1%
14,492 facilities with a CMS staffing star.

CMS-reported data · updated 2026-08-21 · site-calculated context, not a CMS rating

Methodology
Counts every nursing home carrying a CMS staffing star in the current snapshot. Facilities without a staffing star are excluded from the distribution rather than counted as zero — a missing rating is not a low rating.

Staffing against the other CMS domains

The overall star blends inspection, staffing, and quality measures. They do not contribute equally.

Average star by CMS domain

Which of the CMS rating domains run high and which run low, across facilities rated on all four.

Quality measures
3.66★
Overall star
3.00★
Staffing
2.87★
Health inspection
2.82★
14,433 facilities rated in all four domains.

CMS-reported data · updated 2026-08-21 · site-calculated context, not a CMS rating

Methodology
Averages computed over the 14,433 facilities that carry a rating in all four domains, so the same facilities contribute to every bar. Restricting to fully-rated facilities avoids the composition effect that would arise if each domain were averaged over a different subset.

The two domains grounded in outside verification — the on-site health inspection and staffing, which CMS derives from submitted payroll data — average lowest. The quality-measure domain, which draws substantially on facility-reported assessment data, averages highest. That ordering is why the overall star can sit above what a family would infer from the inspection and staffing records alone.

When a strong overall star sits on thin staffing

The specific case a family checking one facility would want to catch.

Among the 14,433 fully-rated facilities, 1,284 (8.9%) hold a 4- or 5-star overall rating while holding a 1- or 2-star staffing rating. That is roughly one in 11 highly-rated facilities.

This is not evidence of poor care, and it is not evidence that CMS is wrong. The overall star is a composite and is designed to blend domains; a facility can score well on measured resident outcomes while reporting fewer staffing hours per resident day than its peers. The practical point is narrower: the headline star does not tell you the staffing story, and the staffing star is published separately for exactly that reason. Every facility page on this site shows all four domains together.

What this does and does not tell you

  • Staffing stars are relative, not absolute. CMS assigns them by comparing a facility’s reported staffing hours per resident day against national distributions. A 1-star staffing rating means low relative to peers, not a specific hours figure.
  • Staffing levels change. The rating reflects a past reporting period. A facility that has recently hired, or recently lost staff, will not show it yet.
  • Case mix matters. Facilities serving residents with heavier care needs require more staffing to achieve the same rating; CMS adjusts for this, but no adjustment is perfect.
  • This is not a ranking. These are distributions across the country. They say nothing about any individual facility, and SeniorCareRating.com does not rate or recommend providers.

The CMS Research Brief

New CMS data releases, Special Focus Facility changes, and each new analysis.

One email covering what changed in the public CMS record: dataset releases and what moved in them, additions to and departures from the Special Focus Facility list, and any new analysis published here. Written for people who work with this data. Roughly monthly.

I agree to receive the CMS Research Brief by email and understand I can unsubscribe at any time. Your address is stored only to send this brief. No health or care information is collected, nothing is shared with providers or advertisers, and SeniorCareRating.com does not sell or rent subscriber data.

Continue your research

SeniorCareRating.com summarizes public CMS data. It is not affiliated with CMS, Medicare.gov, or any nursing home. Data may lag current conditions. This is not medical, legal, or care-placement advice — always verify with official sources and qualified professionals.