Nursing home

The Villa at the Bay

1500 Spring Street, Petoskey, MI, 49770

CMS ownership records associate this facility with Villa Healthcare · For profit - Corporation.

CMS overall rating
CMS overall rating: 1 out of 51of 5

At a glance

CMS reports a 1-star overall rating for The Villa at the Bay, with 58 inspection citations on record (4 higher severity). Federal records include $241,488 and 3 payment-denial records in the current dataset.
CMS overall
1
of 5
Health inspection
1
of 5
Staffing
2
of 5
Quality measures
4
of 5
Certified beds
110
CMS-reported

CMS rating profile

The four CMS ratings on one aligned scale, with county and state averages for context.

Rating profile

How this facility's overall rating relates to its three CMS component ratings.

Overall1 of 5
Health inspection1 of 5
Staffing2 of 5
Quality measures4 of 5

CMS-reported data · updated 2026-07-17

Comparative context

This facility's CMS overall rating next to its county and state averages.

This facility 1
15
Emmet Co. avg 3Michigan avg 3.17This facility
This facility: 1 of 5. Emmet Co. avg: 3. Michigan avg: 3.17.

CMS-reported data · updated 2026-07-17 · site-calculated context, not a CMS rating

Methodology
Averages are calculated from CMS records included in this dataset and exclude facilities CMS has not rated. A neutral reference point, not a CMS rating or a pass/fail line.

Inspections and citations

Health-inspection citations CMS reports for this facility. Individual records are in the technical appendix.

Citation profile

How many citations CMS reports, how severe, and when they occurred.

58
Citations on record
4
Higher severity (G–L)
15
From complaints
1
Infection control
Citations by inspection year
232023
122024
232025
Higher severity Standard

CMS-reported data · updated 2026-07-17

Methodology
Severity uses the CMS scope-and-severity letter (G–L count as higher severity). Counts are CMS-reported inspection findings, not a judgment about current conditions.

Federal records

Federal fines (CMPs) and payment-denial records CMS reports in the recent reporting period. These are distinct record types and are never merged.

Federal fines (CMP)

Fine records over time, sized by amount.

2 records · $241,488 total · Feb 20, 2025–May 22, 2025
  1. May 22, 2025$110,448
  2. Feb 20, 2025$131,040

CMS-reported data · updated 2026-07-17

Payment denials

Payment-denial records over time, sized by duration.

3 records · 73 days total · Jul 17, 2024–May 22, 2025
  1. May 22, 202529 days
  2. Feb 20, 202518 days
  3. Jul 17, 202426 days

CMS-reported data · updated 2026-07-17

Methodology
CMS may deny Medicare/Medicaid payment for new admissions. This is a distinct record type from a civil monetary fine. Confirm current status on CMS Care Compare.

Staffing and care

Selected CMS care indicators for long-stay residents, with a typical level for context. The CMS staffing star rating appears in the rating profile above.

Selected care measures

How this facility's reported care indicators sit against a typical level.

3 of 3 care measures reported by CMS
On antipsychotic medication(lower is better)16.77%

Long-stay residents given antipsychotic medication.

With new/worsened pressure ulcers(lower is better)4.81%

Long-stay residents with new or worsened pressure ulcers.

Falls with major injury(lower is better)6.18%

Long-stay residents with one or more falls with major injury.

CMS-reported data · updated 2026-07-17 · site-calculated context, not a CMS rating

Methodology
The tick marks a typical level for context and is calculated from CMS records included in this dataset — not a CMS rating. Per-shift staffing hours are not part of this dataset. Missing values are shown as “Not reported”, never as zero.

Facilities and agencies grouped by CMS-reported ownership fields. A company appearing here does not by itself mean it controlled day-to-day care or did anything wrong.

Owner / organizationRole
Omnia Opco Holdings LLC5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST
Aaron, JonathanCORPORATE OFFICER
Baumol, YehoshuaOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL
Graf, MarcellaOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL
Mclenna, AshleyOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL
Singerman, JosephOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL
Berger, MenachemINDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNF
Israel, BenjaminINDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNF
Kroll, GabrielINDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNF
Nagel, StevenINDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNF
Stern, ToddINDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNF
Mclenna, AshleyADP OF THE SNF
Singerman, JosephADP OF THE SNF

Nearby facilities

Other CMS-certified nursing homes near Emmet County.

1500 Spring Street, Petoskey
Emmet County · MI · 49770
110 certified beds45.3612, -84.9710

Verify the current location and license with official sources.

FacilityLocationOverallHealthStaffingCMS abuse iconFederal penalties
Oceana County Medical Care Facility
CCN 235002
Hart, MI555Not shown$0
Manistee County Medical Care Facility
CCN 235003
Manistee, MI555Not shown$0
Optalis Health & Rehabilitation of Muskegon
CCN 235004
Muskegon, MI223Not shown$0
Maples Benzie County Medical Care
CCN 235005
Frankfort, MI535Not shown$1,398
Munson Healthcare Otsego Memorial Hospital LTCU
CCN 235006
Gaylord, MI444Not shown$0
Maple Lawn Medical Care Facility
CCN 235008
Coldwater, MI545Not shown$0

Related research

Frequently asked questions

What is The Villa at the Bay's CMS rating?

The Villa at the Bay has a 1-star CMS overall rating (out of 5) in the current dataset, with CMS component ratings of 1 for health inspections, 2 for staffing, and 4 for quality measures. A star rating is a CMS summary of past data, not a judgment about current conditions.

Where is The Villa at the Bay located?

The Villa at the Bay is located at 1500 Spring Street, Petoskey, MI, 49770 in Emmet County, and CMS lists 110 certified beds.

Does The Villa at the Bay have federal penalties or payment denials on record?

The CMS data includes $241,488 in federal fine amounts and 3 payment-denial records for The Villa at the Bay over roughly the past three years. These are CMS-reported records; see CMS Care Compare for the details and context.

How does The Villa at the Bay's rating compare to nearby facilities?

The Villa at the Bay's CMS overall rating is 1 of 5. For comparison, the average CMS overall rating is 3 across 2 facilities in Emmet County, and 3.17 across Michigan. Averages exclude facilities CMS has not rated, and a star rating is a CMS summary, not a judgment about any individual facility.

How can I verify The Villa at the Bay's current information?

SeniorCareRating.com organizes public CMS data and is not affiliated with CMS. Confirm The Villa at the Bay's current ratings, inspection reports, and license status on the official CMS Care Compare site and with your state survey agency.

Technical appendix

Record identifiers

CMS provider number (CCN)
235429
Ownership type
For profit - Corporation
Certified beds
110
Data snapshot
2026-07-17
All 58 citation records
DateCMS tagSeverityTypeCMS deficiency statusCorrection date
Nov 26, 20250603DComplaintDeficient, Provider has date of correctionDec 2, 2025
May 22, 20250554DStandardDeficient, Provider has date of correctionJun 25, 2025
May 22, 20250578EStandardDeficient, Provider has date of correctionJun 25, 2025
May 22, 20250585DStandardDeficient, Provider has date of correctionJul 9, 2025
May 22, 20250628FStandardDeficient, Provider has date of correctionJun 25, 2025
May 22, 20250657DStandardDeficient, Provider has date of correctionJul 9, 2025
May 22, 20250677EStandardDeficient, Provider has date of correctionJun 25, 2025
May 22, 20250686GStandardDeficient, Provider has date of correctionJun 25, 2025
May 22, 20250688DStandardDeficient, Provider has date of correctionJun 25, 2025
May 22, 20250690DStandardDeficient, Provider has date of correctionJun 25, 2025
May 22, 20250695DStandardDeficient, Provider has date of correctionJul 18, 2025
May 22, 20250803FStandardDeficient, Provider has date of correctionJun 25, 2025
May 22, 20250809FStandardDeficient, Provider has date of correctionJul 18, 2025
May 22, 20250812FStandardDeficient, Provider has date of correctionJul 18, 2025
May 22, 20250880DStandardDeficient, Provider has date of correctionJul 18, 2025
May 22, 20250906FStandardDeficient, Provider has date of correctionJun 25, 2025
May 22, 20250919FStandardDeficient, Provider has date of correctionJun 25, 2025
May 22, 20250684GComplaintDeficient, Provider has date of correctionJun 25, 2025
Feb 20, 20250580DComplaintDeficient, Provider has date of correctionMar 14, 2025
Feb 20, 20250684GComplaintDeficient, Provider has date of correctionApr 8, 2025
Feb 20, 20250725DComplaintDeficient, Provider has date of correctionMar 14, 2025
Feb 20, 20250726DComplaintDeficient, Provider has date of correctionMar 14, 2025
Feb 20, 20250760DComplaintDeficient, Provider has date of correctionMar 14, 2025
Jul 17, 20240686GStandardDeficient, Provider has date of correctionAug 13, 2024
Jul 17, 20240689DStandardPast Non-ComplianceJul 14, 2024
Showing the 25 most recent of 58 citations.

How to verify this data

  • The current CMS profile on Medicare’s Care Compare
  • Your state survey agency’s latest inspection reports
  • Any recent complaint investigations
  • Current ownership and license status

SeniorCareRating.com organizes public CMS data and is not affiliated with CMS. Ratings and records are CMS-reported summaries of past data, not a judgment about current conditions. See methodology.

SeniorCareRating.com summarizes public CMS data. It is not affiliated with CMS, Medicare.gov, or any nursing home. Data may lag current conditions. This is not medical, legal, or care-placement advice — always verify with official sources and qualified professionals.