Nursing home

Gardens at Terracina Health & Rehabilitation

6869 Davis Boulevard, Naples, FL, 34104

CMS ownership records associate this facility with The Goodman Group · For profit - Corporation.

CMS overall rating
CMS overall rating: 5 out of 55of 5

At a glance

CMS reports a 5-star overall rating for Gardens at Terracina Health & Rehabilitation, with 4 inspection citations on record. Federal records include $10,881 in the current dataset.
CMS overall
5
of 5
Health inspection
4
of 5
Staffing
4
of 5
Quality measures
5
of 5
Certified beds
30
CMS-reported

CMS rating profile

The four CMS ratings on one aligned scale, with county and state averages for context.

Rating profile

How this facility's overall rating relates to its three CMS component ratings.

Overall5 of 5
Health inspection4 of 5
Staffing4 of 5
Quality measures5 of 5

CMS-reported data · updated 2026-07-17

Comparative context

This facility's CMS overall rating next to its county and state averages.

This facility 5
15
Collier Co. avg 2.82Florida avg 3.27This facility
This facility: 5 of 5. Collier Co. avg: 2.82. Florida avg: 3.27.

CMS-reported data · updated 2026-07-17 · site-calculated context, not a CMS rating

Methodology
Averages are calculated from CMS records included in this dataset and exclude facilities CMS has not rated. A neutral reference point, not a CMS rating or a pass/fail line.

Inspections and citations

Health-inspection citations CMS reports for this facility. Individual records are in the technical appendix.

Citation profile

How many citations CMS reports, how severe, and when they occurred.

4
Citations on record
0
Higher severity (G–L)
0
From complaints
0
Infection control
Citations by inspection year
32023
12024
Higher severity Standard

CMS-reported data · updated 2026-07-17

Methodology
Severity uses the CMS scope-and-severity letter (G–L count as higher severity). Counts are CMS-reported inspection findings, not a judgment about current conditions.

Federal records

Federal fines (CMPs) and payment-denial records CMS reports in the recent reporting period. These are distinct record types and are never merged.

Federal fines (CMP)

Fine records over time, sized by amount.

2 records · $10,881 total · May 30, 2024
  1. May 30, 2024$6,796
  2. May 30, 2024$4,085

CMS-reported data · updated 2026-07-17

Payment denials

Payment-denial records over time, sized by duration.

No payment-denial records are included in this data for this facility.

CMS-reported data · updated 2026-07-17

Methodology
CMS may deny Medicare/Medicaid payment for new admissions. This is a distinct record type from a civil monetary fine. Confirm current status on CMS Care Compare.

Staffing and care

Selected CMS care indicators for long-stay residents, with a typical level for context. The CMS staffing star rating appears in the rating profile above.

Selected care measures

How this facility's reported care indicators sit against a typical level.

0 of 3 care measures reported by CMS
On antipsychotic medication(lower is better)Not reported

Long-stay residents given antipsychotic medication.

With new/worsened pressure ulcers(lower is better)Not reported

Long-stay residents with new or worsened pressure ulcers.

Falls with major injury(lower is better)Not reported

Long-stay residents with one or more falls with major injury.

CMS-reported data · updated 2026-07-17 · site-calculated context, not a CMS rating

Methodology
The tick marks a typical level for context and is calculated from CMS records included in this dataset — not a CMS rating. Per-shift staffing hours are not part of this dataset. Missing values are shown as “Not reported”, never as zero.

Facilities and agencies grouped by CMS-reported ownership fields. A company appearing here does not by itself mean it controlled day-to-day care or did anything wrong.

Owner / organizationRole
2012 Goodman Family Gst5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST
John B. Goodman 2006 Irrv Grantor Tr5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST
South Dakota Trust Company, LLC5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST
Benson, Randall5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST
Salmen, Thomas5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST
Weichert, James5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST
Wilson, Mark5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST
Huisman, HenryW-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEE
Benson, RandallCORPORATE OFFICER
Edinger, CraigCORPORATE OFFICER
Knacke, ClintonCORPORATE OFFICER
Olson, DeniseCORPORATE OFFICER
Weichert, JamesCORPORATE OFFICER

Nearby facilities

Other CMS-certified nursing homes near Collier County.

6869 Davis Boulevard, Naples
Collier County · FL · 34104
30 certified beds26.1388, -81.7270

Verify the current location and license with official sources.

FacilityLocationOverallHealthStaffingCMS abuse iconFederal penalties
Lake Eustis Healthcare and Rehabilitation Center
CCN 105001
Eustis, FL213Not shown$17,345
Beach Street Health and Rehabilitation Center
CCN 105002
Daytona Beach, FL434Not shown$0
Coral Gables Nursing and Rehabilitation Center
CCN 105005
Miami, FL555Not shown$0
Biscayne Health and Rehabilitation Center
CCN 105008
North Miami, FL544Not shown$0
Golfcrest Nursing Center
CCN 105009
Hollywood, FL334Not shown$40,755
Aviata at the Sea - Pasadena
CCN 105012
South Pasadena, FL22Not shown$79,797

Related research

Frequently asked questions

What is Gardens at Terracina Health & Rehabilitation's CMS rating?

Gardens at Terracina Health & Rehabilitation has a 5-star CMS overall rating (out of 5) in the current dataset, with CMS component ratings of 4 for health inspections, 4 for staffing, and 5 for quality measures. A star rating is a CMS summary of past data, not a judgment about current conditions.

Where is Gardens at Terracina Health & Rehabilitation located?

Gardens at Terracina Health & Rehabilitation is located at 6869 Davis Boulevard, Naples, FL, 34104 in Collier County, and CMS lists 30 certified beds.

Does Gardens at Terracina Health & Rehabilitation have federal penalties or payment denials on record?

The CMS data includes $10,881 in federal fine amounts and 0 payment-denial records for Gardens at Terracina Health & Rehabilitation over roughly the past three years. These are CMS-reported records; see CMS Care Compare for the details and context.

How does Gardens at Terracina Health & Rehabilitation's rating compare to nearby facilities?

Gardens at Terracina Health & Rehabilitation's CMS overall rating is 5 of 5. For comparison, the average CMS overall rating is 2.82 across 11 facilities in Collier County, and 3.27 across Florida. Averages exclude facilities CMS has not rated, and a star rating is a CMS summary, not a judgment about any individual facility.

How can I verify Gardens at Terracina Health & Rehabilitation's current information?

SeniorCareRating.com organizes public CMS data and is not affiliated with CMS. Confirm Gardens at Terracina Health & Rehabilitation's current ratings, inspection reports, and license status on the official CMS Care Compare site and with your state survey agency.

Technical appendix

Record identifiers

CMS provider number (CCN)
106129
Ownership type
For profit - Corporation
Certified beds
30
Data snapshot
2026-07-17
All 4 citation records
DateCMS tagSeverityTypeCMS deficiency statusCorrection date
May 30, 20240883EStandardDeficient, Provider has date of correctionJun 30, 2024
Feb 16, 20230563DStandardDeficient, Provider has date of correctionMar 16, 2023
Feb 16, 20230684DStandardDeficient, Provider has date of correctionMar 16, 2023
Feb 16, 20230686DStandardDeficient, Provider has date of correctionMar 16, 2023

How to verify this data

  • The current CMS profile on Medicare’s Care Compare
  • Your state survey agency’s latest inspection reports
  • Any recent complaint investigations
  • Current ownership and license status

SeniorCareRating.com organizes public CMS data and is not affiliated with CMS. Ratings and records are CMS-reported summaries of past data, not a judgment about current conditions. See methodology.

SeniorCareRating.com summarizes public CMS data. It is not affiliated with CMS, Medicare.gov, or any nursing home. Data may lag current conditions. This is not medical, legal, or care-placement advice — always verify with official sources and qualified professionals.