Rosewood Post Acute
1911 Oak Park Boulevard, Pleasant Hill, CA, 94523
CMS ownership records associate this facility with Windsor · For profit - Corporation.
At a glance
- CMS overall
- 2
- of 5
- Health inspection
- 2
- of 5
- Staffing
- 3
- of 5
- Quality measures
- 4
- of 5
- Certified beds
- 113
- CMS-reported
CMS rating profile
The four CMS ratings on one aligned scale, with county and state averages for context.
Rating profile
How this facility's overall rating relates to its three CMS component ratings.
CMS-reported data · updated 2026-07-17
Comparative context
This facility's CMS overall rating next to its county and state averages.
CMS-reported data · updated 2026-07-17 · site-calculated context, not a CMS rating
Methodology
Inspections and citations
Health-inspection citations CMS reports for this facility. Individual records are in the technical appendix.
Citation profile
How many citations CMS reports, how severe, and when they occurred.
CMS-reported data · updated 2026-07-17
Methodology
Federal records
Federal fines (CMPs) and payment-denial records CMS reports in the recent reporting period. These are distinct record types and are never merged.
No federal penalty records are included in this data for this facility.
Staffing and care
Selected CMS care indicators for long-stay residents, with a typical level for context. The CMS staffing star rating appears in the rating profile above.
Selected care measures
How this facility's reported care indicators sit against a typical level.
Long-stay residents given antipsychotic medication.
Long-stay residents with new or worsened pressure ulcers.
Long-stay residents with one or more falls with major injury.
CMS-reported data · updated 2026-07-17 · site-calculated context, not a CMS rating
Methodology
Ownership
Facilities and agencies grouped by CMS-reported ownership fields. A company appearing here does not by itself mean it controlled day-to-day care or did anything wrong.
| Owner / organization | Role |
|---|---|
| Windsor Norcal 13 Holdings LLC | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST |
| Antelope Holdings I, LLC | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST |
| Tress, Avrohom | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST |
| Robin, Aaron | CORPORATE OFFICER |
| Tress, Avrohom | CORPORATE OFFICER |
| Newgen Administrative Services, LLC | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL |
| Kooturu, Sri Vardhan | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL |
| Shaw, Pamela | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL |
| Youssef, Maggie | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL |
| Antelope Realty Holdings I, LLC | ADP OF THE SNF |
| Newgen Administrative Services, LLC | ADP OF THE SNF |
| Kooturu, Sri Vardhan | ADP OF THE SNF |
| Shaw, Pamela | ADP OF THE SNF |
| Youssef, Maggie | ADP OF THE SNF |
Nearby facilities
Other CMS-certified nursing homes near Contra Costa County.
Verify the current location and license with official sources.
| Facility | Location | Overall | Health | Staffing | CMS abuse icon | Federal penalties |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Redlands Healthcare Center CCN 055001 | Redlands, CA | 5 | 5 | 2 | Not shown | $0 |
| Country Manor Healthcare CCN 055002 | Lake View Terrace, CA | 4 | 2 | 5 | Not shown | $8,018 |
| Eureka Rehabilitation & Wellness Center, LP CCN 055003 | Eureka, CA | 1 | 2 | 1 | Not shown | $8,416 |
| Edgemoor Hospital CCN 055008 | Santee, CA | 4 | 2 | 5 | Shown | $32,295 |
| River View Post Acute CCN 055011 | Modesto, CA | 3 | 2 | 3 | Not shown | $0 |
| Eisenberg Village CCN 055013 | Reseda, CA | 4 | 3 | 5 | Not shown | $30,744 |
Related research
Frequently asked questions
What is Rosewood Post Acute's CMS rating?
Rosewood Post Acute has a 2-star CMS overall rating (out of 5) in the current dataset, with CMS component ratings of 2 for health inspections, 3 for staffing, and 4 for quality measures. A star rating is a CMS summary of past data, not a judgment about current conditions.
Where is Rosewood Post Acute located?
Rosewood Post Acute is located at 1911 Oak Park Boulevard, Pleasant Hill, CA, 94523 in Contra Costa County, and CMS lists 113 certified beds.
Does Rosewood Post Acute have federal penalties or payment denials on record?
The current CMS data shows no federal penalty amounts or payment denials for Rosewood Post Acute over roughly the past three years. Records can change; confirm current status on CMS Care Compare.
How does Rosewood Post Acute's rating compare to nearby facilities?
Rosewood Post Acute's CMS overall rating is 2 of 5. For comparison, the average CMS overall rating is 3.93 across 30 facilities in Contra Costa County, and 3.18 across California. Averages exclude facilities CMS has not rated, and a star rating is a CMS summary, not a judgment about any individual facility.
How can I verify Rosewood Post Acute's current information?
SeniorCareRating.com organizes public CMS data and is not affiliated with CMS. Confirm Rosewood Post Acute's current ratings, inspection reports, and license status on the official CMS Care Compare site and with your state survey agency.
Technical appendix
Record identifiers
- CMS provider number (CCN)
- 056476
- Ownership type
- For profit - Corporation
- Certified beds
- 113
- Data snapshot
- 2026-07-17
All 35 citation records
| Date | CMS tag | Severity | Type | CMS deficiency status | Correction date |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 2, 2026 | 0552 | D | Complaint | Deficient, Provider has date of correction | Mar 16, 2026 |
| Mar 2, 2026 | 0553 | D | Complaint | Deficient, Provider has date of correction | Mar 16, 2026 |
| Feb 17, 2026 | 0600 | D | Complaint | Deficient, Provider has date of correction | Feb 24, 2026 |
| Jan 5, 2026 | 0584 | D | Complaint | Deficient, Provider has date of correction | Jan 29, 2026 |
| Dec 19, 2025 | 0609 | D | Complaint | Deficient, Provider has date of correction | Dec 22, 2025 |
| Jun 20, 2025 | 0580 | D | Complaint | Deficient, Provider has date of correction | Jun 23, 2025 |
| Feb 28, 2025 | 0584 | D | Standard | Deficient, Provider has date of correction | Mar 7, 2025 |
| Feb 28, 2025 | 0677 | E | Standard | Deficient, Provider has date of correction | Mar 7, 2025 |
| Feb 28, 2025 | 0688 | E | Standard | Deficient, Provider has date of correction | Mar 7, 2025 |
| Feb 28, 2025 | 0761 | D | Standard | Deficient, Provider has date of correction | Mar 7, 2025 |
| Feb 28, 2025 | 0812 | E | Standard | Deficient, Provider has date of correction | Mar 7, 2025 |
| Feb 28, 2025 | 0880 | E | Standard | Deficient, Provider has date of correction | Mar 7, 2025 |
| Feb 28, 2025 | 0912 | B | Standard | Deficient, Provider has date of correction | Mar 7, 2025 |
| Aug 9, 2024 | 0684 | D | Complaint | Deficient, Provider has date of correction | Aug 28, 2024 |
| Aug 9, 2024 | 0689 | D | Complaint | Deficient, Provider has date of correction | Aug 28, 2024 |
| Jul 24, 2024 | 0600 | D | Complaint | Deficient, Provider has date of correction | Aug 24, 2024 |
| Jul 24, 2024 | 0607 | D | Complaint | Deficient, Provider has date of correction | Aug 24, 2024 |
| Sep 28, 2023 | 0641 | D | Standard | Deficient, Provider has date of correction | Oct 19, 2023 |
| Sep 28, 2023 | 0759 | E | Standard | Deficient, Provider has date of correction | Oct 19, 2023 |
| Sep 28, 2023 | 0761 | E | Standard | Deficient, Provider has date of correction | Oct 19, 2023 |
| Sep 28, 2023 | 0812 | F | Standard | Deficient, Provider has date of correction | Oct 19, 2023 |
| Sep 28, 2023 | 0912 | B | Standard | Deficient, Provider has date of correction | Oct 19, 2023 |
| Mar 12, 2020 | 0578 | D | Standard | Deficient, Provider has date of correction | Apr 10, 2020 |
| Mar 12, 2020 | 0584 | E | Standard | Deficient, Provider has date of correction | Apr 10, 2020 |
| Mar 12, 2020 | 0636 | D | Standard | Deficient, Provider has date of correction | Apr 10, 2020 |
How to verify this data
- The current CMS profile on Medicare’s Care Compare
- Your state survey agency’s latest inspection reports
- Any recent complaint investigations
- Current ownership and license status
SeniorCareRating.com organizes public CMS data and is not affiliated with CMS. Ratings and records are CMS-reported summaries of past data, not a judgment about current conditions. See methodology.