Nursing home

St Paul's Towers

100 Bay Place, Oakland, CA, 94610

CMS ownership records associate this facility with Front Porch · Non profit - Corporation.

CMS overall rating
CMS overall rating: 5 out of 55of 5

At a glance

CMS reports a 5-star overall rating for St Paul's Towers, with 20 inspection citations on record. No federal fine or payment-denial records appear in the current dataset.
CMS overall
5
of 5
Health inspection
4
of 5
Staffing
5
of 5
Quality measures
5
of 5
Certified beds
43
CMS-reported

CMS rating profile

The four CMS ratings on one aligned scale, with county and state averages for context.

Rating profile

How this facility's overall rating relates to its three CMS component ratings.

Overall5 of 5
Health inspection4 of 5
Staffing5 of 5
Quality measures5 of 5

CMS-reported data · updated 2026-07-17

Comparative context

This facility's CMS overall rating next to its county and state averages.

This facility 5
15
Alameda Co. avg 3.71California avg 3.18This facility
This facility: 5 of 5. Alameda Co. avg: 3.71. California avg: 3.18.

CMS-reported data · updated 2026-07-17 · site-calculated context, not a CMS rating

Methodology
Averages are calculated from CMS records included in this dataset and exclude facilities CMS has not rated. A neutral reference point, not a CMS rating or a pass/fail line.

Inspections and citations

Health-inspection citations CMS reports for this facility. Individual records are in the technical appendix.

Citation profile

How many citations CMS reports, how severe, and when they occurred.

20
Citations on record
0
Higher severity (G–L)
0
From complaints
0
Infection control
Citations by inspection year
62019
92022
52024
Higher severity Standard

CMS-reported data · updated 2026-07-17

Methodology
Severity uses the CMS scope-and-severity letter (G–L count as higher severity). Counts are CMS-reported inspection findings, not a judgment about current conditions.

Federal records

Federal fines (CMPs) and payment-denial records CMS reports in the recent reporting period. These are distinct record types and are never merged.

No federal penalty records are included in this data for this facility.

Staffing and care

Selected CMS care indicators for long-stay residents, with a typical level for context. The CMS staffing star rating appears in the rating profile above.

Selected care measures

How this facility's reported care indicators sit against a typical level.

3 of 3 care measures reported by CMS
On antipsychotic medication(lower is better)2.86%

Long-stay residents given antipsychotic medication.

With new/worsened pressure ulcers(lower is better)5.44%

Long-stay residents with new or worsened pressure ulcers.

Falls with major injury(lower is better)0%

Long-stay residents with one or more falls with major injury.

CMS-reported data · updated 2026-07-17 · site-calculated context, not a CMS rating

Methodology
The tick marks a typical level for context and is calculated from CMS records included in this dataset — not a CMS rating. Per-shift staffing hours are not part of this dataset. Missing values are shown as “Not reported”, never as zero.

Facilities and agencies grouped by CMS-reported ownership fields. A company appearing here does not by itself mean it controlled day-to-day care or did anything wrong.

Owner / organizationRole
Front Porch Communities and Services5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST
Duranteau, NancyCORPORATE DIRECTOR
Forte, VincentCORPORATE DIRECTOR
Handy, JoanneCORPORATE DIRECTOR
Jacobs, LauraCORPORATE DIRECTOR
Kroeker, KevinCORPORATE DIRECTOR
Mcgovern, MarionCORPORATE DIRECTOR
Proctor, DeborahCORPORATE DIRECTOR
Spencer, PeterCORPORATE DIRECTOR
Tonnu, DiemlanCORPORATE DIRECTOR
Wesson, OliverCORPORATE DIRECTOR
Whittaker, SusanCORPORATE DIRECTOR
Kelly, SeanCORPORATE OFFICER
Salvador, EduardoCORPORATE OFFICER
Vranich, RachelCORPORATE OFFICER
Akopyan, GevorkOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL
Cairns, DawnOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL
Herzig, RandyOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL
Kelly, SeanOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL
Kisajja, ChristinaOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL
Marcelo, CherryOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL
Mcmullin, MaryOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL
Olson, KariOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL
Sairam, SamirOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL
Salvador, EduardoOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL
Yuen, ConnieOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL
Merkin, NickolasINDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNF
Nelson, HarryINDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNF
Pennington, PaigeINDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNF
Front Porch Communities and ServicesADP OF THE SNF
Marcelo, CherryADP OF THE SNF
Sairam, SamirADP OF THE SNF

Nearby facilities

Other CMS-certified nursing homes near Alameda County.

100 Bay Place, Oakland
Alameda County · CA · 94610
43 certified beds37.8119, -122.2600

Verify the current location and license with official sources.

FacilityLocationOverallHealthStaffingCMS abuse iconFederal penalties
Redlands Healthcare Center
CCN 055001
Redlands, CA552Not shown$0
Country Manor Healthcare
CCN 055002
Lake View Terrace, CA425Not shown$8,018
Eureka Rehabilitation & Wellness Center, LP
CCN 055003
Eureka, CA121Not shown$8,416
Edgemoor Hospital
CCN 055008
Santee, CA425Shown$32,295
River View Post Acute
CCN 055011
Modesto, CA323Not shown$0
Eisenberg Village
CCN 055013
Reseda, CA435Not shown$30,744

Related research

Frequently asked questions

What is St Paul's Towers's CMS rating?

St Paul's Towers has a 5-star CMS overall rating (out of 5) in the current dataset, with CMS component ratings of 4 for health inspections, 5 for staffing, and 5 for quality measures. A star rating is a CMS summary of past data, not a judgment about current conditions.

Where is St Paul's Towers located?

St Paul's Towers is located at 100 Bay Place, Oakland, CA, 94610 in Alameda County, and CMS lists 43 certified beds.

Does St Paul's Towers have federal penalties or payment denials on record?

The current CMS data shows no federal penalty amounts or payment denials for St Paul's Towers over roughly the past three years. Records can change; confirm current status on CMS Care Compare.

How does St Paul's Towers's rating compare to nearby facilities?

St Paul's Towers's CMS overall rating is 5 of 5. For comparison, the average CMS overall rating is 3.71 across 69 facilities in Alameda County, and 3.18 across California. Averages exclude facilities CMS has not rated, and a star rating is a CMS summary, not a judgment about any individual facility.

How can I verify St Paul's Towers's current information?

SeniorCareRating.com organizes public CMS data and is not affiliated with CMS. Confirm St Paul's Towers's current ratings, inspection reports, and license status on the official CMS Care Compare site and with your state survey agency.

Technical appendix

Record identifiers

CMS provider number (CCN)
055156
Ownership type
Non profit - Corporation
Certified beds
43
Data snapshot
2026-07-17
All 20 citation records
DateCMS tagSeverityTypeCMS deficiency statusCorrection date
Sep 12, 20240658DStandardDeficient, Provider has date of correctionOct 7, 2024
Sep 12, 20240757DStandardDeficient, Provider has date of correctionOct 7, 2024
Sep 12, 20240758DStandardDeficient, Provider has date of correctionOct 7, 2024
Sep 12, 20240812FStandardDeficient, Provider has date of correctionOct 7, 2024
Sep 12, 20240814FStandardDeficient, Provider has date of correctionOct 7, 2024
Oct 13, 20220687DStandardDeficient, Provider has date of correctionNov 3, 2022
Oct 13, 20220689DStandardDeficient, Provider has date of correctionNov 3, 2022
Oct 13, 20220727DStandardDeficient, Provider has date of correctionNov 3, 2022
Oct 13, 20220755DStandardDeficient, Provider has date of correctionNov 3, 2022
Oct 13, 20220756DStandardDeficient, Provider has date of correctionNov 3, 2022
Oct 13, 20220758DStandardDeficient, Provider has date of correctionNov 3, 2022
Oct 13, 20220759DStandardDeficient, Provider has date of correctionNov 3, 2022
Oct 13, 20220812EStandardDeficient, Provider has date of correctionNov 3, 2022
Oct 13, 20220814DStandardDeficient, Provider has date of correctionNov 3, 2022
Jun 27, 20190656DStandardDeficient, Provider has date of correctionJul 26, 2019
Jun 27, 20190755DStandardDeficient, Provider has date of correctionJul 26, 2019
Jun 27, 20190756EStandardDeficient, Provider has date of correctionJul 26, 2019
Jun 27, 20190758DStandardDeficient, Provider has date of correctionJul 26, 2019
Jun 27, 20190790EStandardDeficient, Provider has date of correctionJul 26, 2019
Jun 27, 20190812EStandardDeficient, Provider has date of correctionJul 26, 2019

How to verify this data

  • The current CMS profile on Medicare’s Care Compare
  • Your state survey agency’s latest inspection reports
  • Any recent complaint investigations
  • Current ownership and license status

SeniorCareRating.com organizes public CMS data and is not affiliated with CMS. Ratings and records are CMS-reported summaries of past data, not a judgment about current conditions. See methodology.

SeniorCareRating.com summarizes public CMS data. It is not affiliated with CMS, Medicare.gov, or any nursing home. Data may lag current conditions. This is not medical, legal, or care-placement advice — always verify with official sources and qualified professionals.