Nursing home

Piedmont Gardens Health Facility

110 41st Street, Oakland, CA, 94611

CMS ownership records associate this facility with Humangood · Non profit - Corporation.

CMS overall rating

5of 5

At a glance

CMS reports a 5-star overall rating for Piedmont Gardens Health Facility, with 11 inspection citations on record. No federal fine or payment-denial records appear in the current dataset.

CMS overall: 5; of 5
Health inspection: 5; of 5
Staffing: 5; of 5
Quality measures: 4; of 5
Certified beds: 94; CMS-reported

CMS rating profile

The four CMS ratings on one aligned scale, with county and state averages for context.

Rating profile

How this facility's overall rating relates to its three CMS component ratings.

Overall

5 of 5

Health inspection

5 of 5

Staffing

5 of 5

Quality measures

4 of 5

CMS-reported data · updated 2026-08-21

Comparative context

This facility's CMS overall rating next to its county and state averages.

This facility 5★

1★5★

Alameda Co. avg 3.71★California avg 3.18★This facility

CMS-reported data · updated 2026-08-21 · site-calculated context, not a CMS rating

Methodology

Averages are calculated from CMS records included in this dataset and exclude facilities CMS has not rated. A neutral reference point, not a CMS rating or a pass/fail line.

Inspections and citations

Health-inspection citations CMS reports for this facility. Individual records are in the technical appendix.

Citation profile

How many citations CMS reports, how severe, and when they occurred.

Citations on record

Higher severity (G–L)

From complaints

Infection control

Citations by inspection year

32019

52022

32025

Higher severity Standard

CMS-reported data · updated 2026-08-21

Methodology

Severity uses the CMS scope-and-severity letter (G–L count as higher severity). Counts are CMS-reported inspection findings, not a judgment about current conditions.

Federal records

Federal fines (CMPs) and payment-denial records CMS reports in the recent reporting period. These are distinct record types and are never merged.

No federal penalty records are included in this data for this facility.

Staffing and care

Selected CMS care indicators for long-stay residents, with a typical level for context. The CMS staffing star rating appears in the rating profile above.

Selected care measures

How this facility's reported care indicators sit against a typical level.

3 of 3 care measures reported by CMS

On antipsychotic medication(lower is better)13.93%

Long-stay residents given antipsychotic medication.

With new/worsened pressure ulcers(lower is better)6.98%

Long-stay residents with new or worsened pressure ulcers.

Falls with major injury(lower is better)0%

Long-stay residents with one or more falls with major injury.

CMS-reported data · updated 2026-08-21 · site-calculated context, not a CMS rating

Methodology

The tick marks a typical level for context and is calculated from CMS records included in this dataset — not a CMS rating. Per-shift staffing hours are not part of this dataset. Missing values are shown as “Not reported”, never as zero.

Ownership

View ownership profile →

Facilities and agencies grouped by CMS-reported ownership fields. A company appearing here does not by itself mean it controlled day-to-day care or did anything wrong.

Owner / organization	Role
Humangood Norcal	5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST
U.S. Bank	5% OR GREATER SECURITY INTEREST
Baker, Judith	CORPORATE DIRECTOR
Battison, William	CORPORATE DIRECTOR
Brown, Herman	CORPORATE DIRECTOR
Christopherson, Joanne	CORPORATE DIRECTOR
Feller, Irene	CORPORATE DIRECTOR
Griffith, Alan	CORPORATE DIRECTOR
Holmes, Michelle	CORPORATE DIRECTOR
Kelley, Albert	CORPORATE DIRECTOR
Roth, Sharon	CORPORATE DIRECTOR
Brown, Herman	CORPORATE OFFICER
Cochrane, John	CORPORATE OFFICER
Ghassemi, Bethany	CORPORATE OFFICER
Mcdonald, Andrew	CORPORATE OFFICER
Ogus, Daniel	CORPORATE OFFICER
Humangood Norcal	OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL
Humangood Socal	OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL
Baker, Judith	OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL
Battison, William	OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL
Christopherson, Joanne	OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL
Cochrane, John	OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL
Dhugga, Gurpreet	OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL
Feller, Irene	OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL
Gesinger, Jana	OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL
Ghassemi, Bethany	OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL
Griffith, Alan	OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL
Holmes, Michelle	OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL
Kelley, Albert	OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL
Mast, Russell	OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL
Mcdonald, Andrew	OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL
Ogus, Daniel	OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL
Punla, Myra	OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL
Vangelisto, Gwen	OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL
Wittman, Daniel	OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL
Baker Tilly US, LLP	ADP OF THE SNF
Humangood	ADP OF THE SNF
Humangood Norcal	ADP OF THE SNF
Humangood Socal	ADP OF THE SNF
Pharmerica Drug Systems LLC	ADP OF THE SNF
U.S. Bank	ADP OF THE SNF
Washington Federal	ADP OF THE SNF
Dhugga, Gurpreet	ADP OF THE SNF
Gesinger, Jana	ADP OF THE SNF
Punla, Myra	ADP OF THE SNF
Vangelisto, Gwen	ADP OF THE SNF

Looking for reviews of Piedmont Gardens Health Facility?

A direct answer, and where to find first-hand accounts.

SeniorCareRating.com does not publish consumer reviews, testimonials, or any rating of its own — not for Piedmont Gardens Health Facility and not for any provider. Nothing on this page is an opinion about the care delivered here.

What this page does contain is the public CMS record: state-survey inspection findings with their dates and severity, staffing levels, quality measures, federal penalty records, and ownership. Those are documented findings from official inspections and reporting rather than individual accounts, so they answer a different — and independently verifiable — part of the same question. See the record for Piedmont Gardens Health Facility

For first-hand accounts, the most reliable routes are people rather than pages: ask the provider directly for references from current residents or clients and their families, and speak with your state long-term care ombudsman, whose office advocates for residents and tracks complaints independently of the provider. Ombudsman services are free and confidential.

Find your state long-term care ombudsman — National Long-Term Care Ombudsman Resource Center
Eldercare Locator — the U.S. Administration for Community Living’s public referral service

Read published reviews from any source with the same care you would apply to the CMS record: both are partial. A small number of strongly worded reviews can reflect a handful of experiences rather than the typical one, and an inspection finding describes a specific date rather than conditions today.

Nearby facilities

Other CMS-certified nursing homes near Alameda County.

110 41st Street, Oakland

Alameda County · CA · 94611

94 certified beds37.8264, -122.2500

Verify the current location and license with official sources.

All California counties →All in Alameda County →More from Humangood →

Facility	Location	Overall	Health	Staffing	CMS abuse icon	Federal penalties
Redlands Healthcare Center CCN 055001	Redlands, CA	5	5	2	Not shown	$0
Country Manor Healthcare CCN 055002	Lake View Terrace, CA	4	2	5	Not shown	$8,018
Eureka Rehabilitation & Wellness Center, LP CCN 055003	Eureka, CA	1	2	1	Not shown	$8,416
Edgemoor Hospital CCN 055008	Santee, CA	4	2	5	Shown	$32,295
River View Post Acute CCN 055011	Modesto, CA	3	2	3	Not shown	$0
Eisenberg Village CCN 055013	Reseda, CA	4	3	5	Not shown	$30,744

Continue your research

Frequently asked questions

What is Piedmont Gardens Health Facility's CMS rating?

Piedmont Gardens Health Facility has a 5-star CMS overall rating (out of 5) in the current dataset, with CMS component ratings of 5 for health inspections, 5 for staffing, and 4 for quality measures. A star rating is a CMS summary of past data, not a judgment about current conditions.

Where is Piedmont Gardens Health Facility located?

Piedmont Gardens Health Facility is located at 110 41st Street, Oakland, CA, 94611 in Alameda County, and CMS lists 94 certified beds.

Does Piedmont Gardens Health Facility have federal penalties or payment denials on record?

The current CMS data shows no federal penalty amounts or payment denials for Piedmont Gardens Health Facility over roughly the past three years. Records can change; confirm current status on CMS Care Compare.

How does Piedmont Gardens Health Facility's rating compare to nearby facilities?

Piedmont Gardens Health Facility's CMS overall rating is 5 of 5. For comparison, the average CMS overall rating is 3.71 across 69 facilities in Alameda County, and 3.18 across California. Averages exclude facilities CMS has not rated, and a star rating is a CMS summary, not a judgment about any individual facility.

Does SeniorCareRating.com have reviews for Piedmont Gardens Health Facility?

No. SeniorCareRating.com does not publish user reviews, ratings of its own, or testimonials about any facility. What this page shows instead is the public CMS record: state-survey inspection findings with their dates and severity, staffing and quality-measure ratings, federal penalty records, and ownership. Those are documented findings from official inspections rather than individual opinions, so they answer a different — and verifiable — part of the same question. For residents' and families' own accounts, ask the facility for references and speak with your state long-term care ombudsman.

How can I verify Piedmont Gardens Health Facility's current information?

SeniorCareRating.com organizes public CMS data and is not affiliated with CMS. Confirm Piedmont Gardens Health Facility's current ratings, inspection reports, and license status on the official CMS Care Compare site and with your state survey agency.

Technical appendix

Record identifiers

CMS provider number (CCN): 056096
Ownership type: Non profit - Corporation
Certified beds: 94
Data snapshot: 2026-08-21

All 11 citation records

Date	CMS tag	Severity	Type	CMS deficiency status	Correction date
Jan 30, 2025	0584	D	Standard	Deficient, Provider has date of correction	Feb 20, 2025
Jan 30, 2025	0656	E	Standard	Deficient, Provider has date of correction	Feb 20, 2025
Jan 30, 2025	0880	E	Standard	Deficient, Provider has date of correction	Feb 20, 2025
Nov 17, 2022	0676	D	Standard	Deficient, Provider has date of correction	Nov 25, 2022
Nov 17, 2022	0684	E	Standard	Deficient, Provider has date of correction	Nov 25, 2022
Nov 17, 2022	0756	D	Standard	Deficient, Provider has date of correction	Nov 25, 2022
Nov 17, 2022	0812	E	Standard	Deficient, Provider has date of correction	Nov 25, 2022
Nov 17, 2022	0881	D	Standard	Deficient, Provider has date of correction	Nov 25, 2022
Apr 11, 2019	0656	D	Standard	Deficient, Provider has date of correction	May 3, 2019
Apr 11, 2019	0697	D	Standard	Deficient, Provider has date of correction	May 3, 2019
Apr 11, 2019	0761	E	Standard	Deficient, Provider has date of correction	May 3, 2019

How to verify this data

The current CMS profile on Medicare’s Care Compare
Your state survey agency’s latest inspection reports
Any recent complaint investigations
Current ownership and license status

SeniorCareRating.com organizes public CMS data and is not affiliated with CMS. Ratings and records are CMS-reported summaries of past data, not a judgment about current conditions. See methodology.

SeniorCareRating.com summarizes public CMS data. It is not affiliated with CMS, Medicare.gov, or any nursing home. Data may lag current conditions. This is not medical, legal, or care-placement advice — always verify with official sources and qualified professionals.